On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:18 PM, P.J. Eby <p...@telecommunity.com> wrote: > At 11:11 AM 9/15/2010 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote: >> >> Given that wsgiref is in the stdlib, I think we should hold up the 3.2 >> release (and even the first beta) until this is resolved, unless we >> can convince ourselves that it's okay to delete wsgiref from the >> stdlib (which sounds unlikely but may not be any more incompatible >> than making it work properly :-). > > FWIW, I'd be fine with that option.
Could we remove in any case the wsgiref.egg-info file ? Since we've been working on a new format for that (PEP 376), that should be starting to get used in the coming years, it'll be a bit of a non-sense to have that metadata file in the sdtlib shipped with 3,2 I am not really sure what was the intent to have it there in the first place though. Regards Tarek -- Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
