This spec, a WSGI-like spec for Python2 and Python3 named Web3 was accepted today as PEP 444.
http://python.org/dev/peps/pep-0444/ Comments and competing specs would be useful. - C On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 18:16 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 13:46 -0700, Brett Cannon wrote: > > Both the RM and BDFL agree that Python 3.2b1 should be held up until > > we settle this wsgi matter. That makes it a question of how to settle > > it. > > > > Thinking out loud here to keep this discussion focused, I say we give > > a deadline for PEPs to be submitted by October 15th. We then choose > > two PEP dictators to make a call by November 1, get wsgiref cleaned up > > ASAP, and get Python 3.2b1 out the door immediately thereafter. If > > web-sig manages to come to an agreement as a whole before then we can > > skip the PEPs, but if they have not managed to do this already then it > > probably is not going to suddenly happen now under threat of > > python-dev making the call for them by blessing a new wsgiref > > implementation (happy to be proven wrong, though). > > FWIW, I've submitted http://github.com/mcdonc/web3/blob/master/web3.rst > as a PEP (by sending a mail to p...@python.org). > > - C > > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/lists%40plope.com > _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
