> I assume this is unintended because (a) the docs weren't changed to > warn about this; and, (b) it's wrong ;-)
It seems Jim is happy with (or has at least accepted) the behavior change. Would you still like to see it fixed (or, rather, have the 2.6 state restored)? I think it would be possible to have two versions of _PyGC_REFS_UNTRACKED, one being, say, -5. _PyGC_REFS_UNTRACKED_AND_KEEP_IT_THAT_WAY would be what you get when you call PyObject_GC_UnTrack; the code to do automatic tracking/untracking based on contents would use some other new API (which would be non-public in 2.7.x). Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
