Am 25.09.2010 23:41, schrieb "Martin v. Löwis": > >> I guess a better example would be >> >> old: >> open #1 #2 >> closed #3 >> new: >> open #1 >> closed #2 #3 #4 #5 >> >> which results in +2 for open (since #4 and #5 were opened) and +3 for closed >> (since #2, #4 and #5 were closed), however the total issue delta is +2. This >> is why I think these numbers should be labeled "openings" and "closings". > > I *have* looked at the code, any I'm certain that this is not how the > computation goes. > > Instead, I'm also certain that it goes as in the message I sent. > Notice that it prints the numbers I put into parentheses (+2, +1), > and they do *not* sum up to +1. The numbers I posted as "delta would > be" are not currently included in the report.
Ah. I misunderstood, sorry. Well, let's bury this thread then and I will put it on my todo list to modify it to work as expected. Georg -- Thus spake the Lord: Thou shalt indent with four spaces. No more, no less. Four shall be the number of spaces thou shalt indent, and the number of thy indenting shall be four. Eight shalt thou not indent, nor either indent thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to four. Tabs are right out. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
