Georg Brandl <g.bra...@gmx.net> writes: > Am 30.09.2010 10:22, schrieb Dirkjan Ochtman: >> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 20:32, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: >>> I would like to recommend that the Python core developers start using >>> a code review tool such as Rietveld or Reviewboard. I don't really >>> care which tool we use (I'm sure there are plenty of pros and cons to >>> each) but I do think we should get out of the stone age and start >>> using a tool for the majority of our code reviews. >> >> Rambling thoughts about some of the things mentioned in this thread. >> >> I think hg-review looks interesting, though it may not (yet) have the >> level of sophistication of Rietveld. (Public test instance at >> http://review.stevelosh.com/.) >> >> It might be interesting to integrate Rietveld uploads in a Mercurial >> extension, particularly if it gets integrated with mq somehow. > > That would be totally awesome!
The Go (the language) project has a Mercurial extension that integrates Rietveld. It seems to provide a few commands for both directions: uploading changelists to a review server and for the reviewer downloading from the server and applying the changelists to a working copy. I never used this extension myself so I can't tell anything about the workflow introduced by these commands. The sources for this extension are here: http://code.google.com/p/go/source/browse/lib/codereview/codereview.py Andi > > Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com