On Oct 02, 2010, at 02:24 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 20:06:57 -0400 >Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote: >> >> With my branch, you'll end up with this in /tmp/python: >> >> bin/python3.2m - the normal build binary >> bin/python3.2dmu - the wide+pydebug build binary >> bin/python3.2m-config >> bin/python3.2dmu-config > >Do users really want to see such idiosyncratic suffixes?
Do note that "make install" will symlink all that away, so you'll still end up
with a single "python3" and "python3-config" pointing to the last one you
installed.
>> ...
>> lib/libpython3.2.so.1.0.m
>> lib/libpython3.2.so.1.0.dmum
>
>Ditto here. This seems to break well-known conventions.
>If I look at /usr/lib{,64} on my machine, I can't see a single
>shared libary file that ends neither in ".so" nor ".so.<some digits>".
>
>Before trying to find a solution to your problem, I think it would be
>nice to get a consensus that this is really a desired feature.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
