On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:55 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote: > I guess somebody would need to do monitoring on them, and ping operators > if the buildbot is down for an extended period of time. Feel free to ping > any operator whenever you notice that a slave is down (they do get > an automated email, but people can get resistant to automated emails). > > Also, if you would want to propose that a different set than the current > ones should be considered stable, please let me know. I believe > "stable" was meant in a different way, though - it would reliably pass all > tests, and a test failure should be considered a bug, rather than > some random failure on the slave.
To simplify the task of contacting buildbot operators, would it be worth having a "python-buildbot-owners" mailing list? Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
