On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:06:37 -0400 Alexander Belopolsky <alexander.belopol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > While I appreciate your and Michael's eloquence, I don't really see > why five 400-line modules are necessarily easier to maintain than one > 2000-line module. Splitting code into modules is certainly a good > thing when the resulting modules can be used independently. This > helps users write leaner programs, reduces mental footprint of > individual modules, etc, etc. The split unittest module does not > bring any such benefits. It still presents a single "big-ball-of-mud" > namespace, only rather than implemented in a single file, it is now > swept in from eight different files.
Are you saying that it has become a pile of medium-sized balls of mud? I would like to say thanks for the mud, Michael! It's high quality mud for sure. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
