2010/10/29 Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org>: > I had a brief conversation with Michael Foord yesterday and he's writing code > that works in 2.4 through 3.2, so for *some* code bases, it's tricky and ugly, > but possible.
If the application does not involve a lot of I/O, 2.4 -> 3.2 support by using a unique code base is possible and not that ugly. At least, that's what happened with psutil: http://code.google.com/p/psutil/issues/detail?id=75&can=1&q=python%203&colspec=ID%20Summary%20Type%20Opsys%20Status%20Milestone%20Opened%20Owner%20Progress#c9 My personal choice is to encourage the same approach where possible. Regards, --- Giampaolo http://code.google.com/p/pyftpdlib http://code.google.com/p/psutil _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
