On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 12:02:27 -0400 "R. David Murray" <rdmur...@bitdance.com> wrote: > > I don't disagree with this simplification, but given that you all want > to pare down the unittest API, I'd be interested in your opinions on > issue 10164. Because the assertBytesEqual method takes an optional > argument, it seems like it would need to be documented, even though > it would in a lot of cases just be used through assertEqual.
The optional argument doesn't look very useful. I imagine there are plenty of special cases where you could need custom splitting of bytestrings on a given byte, a regexp pattern, or along some fixed chunk length, but they are special cases. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
