On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 19:57:48 -0700 Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > > > > How could we have split the module into a package in a way that matched the > > API, whilst still retaining backwards compatibility with the old API? We had > > no choice but to export the public names at the top level. > > I'm not disagreeing with that. What I am saying is can now document > that it's unittest.case.TestCase instead of having that just be an > implementation detail.
-1. unittest.TestCase is far simpler and more obvious that any javaesque qualified name. urllib.request and friends are already annoying enough. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
