On 06/11/2010 19.01, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 11/6/2010 11:42 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:38:22 +0100, Georg Brandl<g.bra...@gmx.net>
wrote:
Am 06.11.2010 05:44, schrieb Ezio Melotti:
Hi,
On 05/11/2010 19.08, Python tracker wrote:
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2010-10-29 - 2010-11-05)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the
issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open 2514 (+17)
This seems wrong. A default search for open issues returns 2452 and it
was about the same yesterday just a few hours after the report.
That's because the "open" count includes about 25 languishing and 39
pending issues (technically they are still open).
closed 19597 (+78)
total 22111 (+95)
as suggested in recent mails[0][1] I changed these values to represent
the deltas with the previous week.
Now let's try to keep the "open" delta negative ;)
Since there were more issues closed than opened I think it really was.
Anyway, we are down 300 from the 2750 peak.
That is a worthy goal, however the difference between the "open" and
"closed"
deltas is already quite an achievement and shows that our triage works.
Yes, even if having a negative delta would be best, having the "closed"
delta higher than then "open" one is still very good.
So congrats to everyone who worked and works to make this possible.
Agreed.
We did have negative open deltas for several weeks running in October.
Kudos to everyone involved, and lets do it some more :) I'm looking
forward to making a non-trivial dent in the open count during the bug
weekend on the 20th/21st.
Best Regards,
Ezio Melotti
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
