On Nov 8, 2010, at 4:42 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote: > Except for making releases that start backporting Python 3 features > and breaking backwards compatibility gradually (which may or may not > be a good idea) I don't see the point. There isn't much to do when it > comes to improving the language, and there is a moratorium anyway. > Improvements in the standard library can be more easily done in > external libraries anyway, and then you can release the improved > libraries for everything from Python 2.4 and forwards if you like. > > So it can be done, but the question is "Why?"
To keep the batteries included? James _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
