Am 08.11.2010 17:02, schrieb Éric Araujo: > Hi Nick, > > If there is no enormous difficulty in maintaining compatibility, I think > the usual deprecation process should be followed. We don’t know who is > using pydoc as a library, so let’s play safe and not risk breaking their > code (especially considering that it must not have been easy to write > code extending pydoc :). > > BTW, doesn’t the process start with PendingDeprecationWarnings, then > DeprecationWarnings?
PendingDeprecationWarnings only make sense for larger changes, especially now that bot Pending and normal DeprecationWarnings are silent by default. See PEP 387 (which is only a draft though). Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
