On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull <step...@xemacs.org> wrote: > ... On the original question, I > think it's preferable to keep compilers happy unless you're willing to > *require* C99.
Hmm, maybe I should take another look at http://bugs.python.org/issue4805 . Note that issue #10359 was not about any real compiler - it was about compiling with gcc -pedantic. If we *require* pedantic c89 compliance - we should add -pedantic -std=c89 to the standard build flags. Otherwise no-compliant code will accumulate between "ISO C cleanups" and such cleanups will continue to pollute VC logs. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
