Am 19.11.2010 15:46, schrieb Barry Warsaw: > On Nov 19, 2010, at 11:50 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > >>- date SVN will go read only > > Please note that svn cannot be made completely read-only. We've already > decided that versions already in maintenance or security-only mode (2.5, 2.6, > 2.7, 3.1) will get updates and releases only via svn. But only the release > managers should have write access to the svn repositories.
Really? I can understand this for security-only branches (commits there will be rare, and equivalent commits to the Mercurial branches can be made by others than the release managers, in order to keep history consistent). But having the maintenance branches (by then, that will mostly be 2.7 because 3.1 will go to security-only mode soon) in SVN will be a burden for every developer, since they have to backport bugfixes from Hg to SVN... Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
