Alexander Belopolsky <alexander.belopol...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: > > Perhaps int(), float(), Decimal() and friends could take an optional > > parameter indicating whether non-ascii digits are considered. It > > would then satisfy all parties. > > What parties? I don't think anyone has claimed to actually have used > non-ASCII digits with float().
Rather, it has been pointed out that there is an unknown amount of existing code which does that. You're not going to know how much or how little from this forum. > Of course it is fun that Python can process Bengali numerals, but so > would be allowing Roman numerals. There is a reason why after careful > consideration, PEP 313 was ultimately rejected. Rejecting a proposed *new* capability is a different matter from disabling an *existing* capability which works in existing Python releases. -- \ “Following fashion and the status quo is easy. Thinking about | `\ your users' lives and creating something practical is much | _o__) harder.” —Ryan Singer, 2008-07-09 | Ben Finney _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
