On 29.11.2010 00:40, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
I have now completed
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0384/
Benjamin has volunteered to rule on this PEP.
Please comment with any changes you want to see, or speak in
favor or against this PEP.
I looked at a diff with r84330 from the py3k branch.
Extensions built with Py_LIMITED_API have the python version encoded in it's
name. Which abi name should be used for these extensions?
- The m and u modifiers in the abi name are complimentary (?)
- debug builds and Py_LIMITED_API are incompatible (?) and therefore
the current name should be used?
- For posix systems the implementation is currently part of the abi name,
are Py_LIMITED_API extensions supposed to be compatible with e.g. PyPy?
Should the LIMITED_API abi name include the implementation string?
- Should the distutils support for LIMITED_API be part of the pep, or
be implemented later?
In favour of the pep.
Matthias
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
