> even without having any changes in distutils it would make sense to know if
> an
> extension can be built with the restricted ABI, so maybe it is better to
> defer
> any changes to the extension soname, and provide a check for an extension if
> it
> conforms to the restricted ABI, even if the extension still uses the python
> version specific soname.
Python’s setup.py has an example in Martin’s branch:
ext = Extension('xxlimited', ['xxlimited.c'],
define_macros=[('Py_LIMITED_API', 1)])
<http://codereview.appspot.com/3262043/patch/1/68>
This is possible with today’s distutils. I don’t know if it’s enough to
build stable-ABI-conformant extension modules.
Regards
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
