Le 09/12/2010 19:42, Guido van Rossum a écrit : > Given that it's in 3.2b1 I'm okay with keeping it. That's at best a > +0. [...]
> though I still don't like that the registries for transforms and > codecs use the same namespace. Also bytes-bytes and > string-string transforms use the same namespace even though the > typical transform only supports one or the other. E.g. IMO all of the > following should raise LookupError: [...] Although I’d regret not having transform/untransform in 3.2, I think there needs to be a discussion about this namespace issue before the new methods ship. Regards _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
