On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 12:55:25 +1000 > Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Terry Reedy <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On 12/10/2010 4:59 PM, R. David Murray wrote: >> > >> >> Like Éric, I'm not sure what the implications of the existing module >> >> having been released in 2.7 and 3.2 beta are in terms of making such an >> >> API change. >> > >> > I am with Raymond on this: the purpose of betas is so we can test *and* >> > make >> > changes. No one should base production software on a beta release. >> >> It's also the key difference between betas and release candidates. > > Seems that both you and Terry have missed the part where the sysconfig > API is already part of 2.7, though.
I had missed that, yes*. I suspect Raymond may have missed it as well. Cheers, Nick. *(I sometimes lose track of which changes were made in both branches pre-2.7, which ones were mode post-2.7 release, and which ones went in pre-2.7, but were 3.x only regardless) -- Nick Coghlan | [email protected] | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
