On 12/13/2010 2:17 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:09:02 -0500
Alexander Belopolsky<alexander.belopol...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Guido van Rossum<gu...@python.org> wrote:
I'm at least +0 on
allowing trailing commas in the situation the OP mentioned.
FWIW, I am also about +0.5 on allowing trailing comma. Note that in a
similar situation, the C standardization committee has erred on the
side of consistency:
"""
A new feature of C99: a common extension in many implementations
allows a trailing comma after the list of enumeration constants. The
Committee decided to adopt this feature as an innocuous extension that
mirrors the trailing commas allowed in initializers.
""" http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/C99RationaleV5.10.pdf
Similarly, I find allowing trailing comma in keyword only arguments
lists to be an innocuous extension that mirrors the trailing commas
allowed in the positional arguments lists.
+1 from me as well. Special cases are hard to remember.
Same here. A strong +1 for a consistent rule (always or never allowed)
with a +1 for always given others use case of one param/arg per line.
So I think the issues should be reopened.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
