Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:20:04 +1000
Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 from me.
If anyone complains too much, perhaps we can offer to retain the old
ConfigParser as "_BuggyConfigParser"? (that idea is only partially
tongue-in-cheek...)
Or we can put it in the "buggy" module which receives all buggy code.
The good thing about that idea is that maintenance of buggy.py will be
so simple!
--
Steven
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
