On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:14:03 -0500 "R. David Murray" <rdmur...@bitdance.com> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 12:58:55 -0500, Jesse Noller <jnol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The concurrent.futures tests should (like the multiprocessing test > > suite) detect the lack of support and skip the tests on the broken > > platforms. I'm sort of surprised FreeBSD support is still broken in > > this way though (echoed by Philip) although it could be an issue on > > that particular buildbot. > > If I'm reading the issue correctly, it isn't that it doesn't work, > it's that the concurrent.futures tests fail because they create more > semaphores than the default FreeBSD install supports.
Doesn't it suggest a possible resource leak somewhere? Or do the concurrent tests really rely on creating many semaphores? (as opposed to say 5 or 10 of them) Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
