On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 12:36:47 -0800 Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
> Martin v. Löwis wrote: > >> And, again, the threading-based API in concurrent.futures should work > >> fine anyway. Do you suggest we selectively disable the process-based > >> API? > > > > Yes. Importing concurrent.futures.process should fail. > > If I understand correctly, it is possible to adjust BSD so that this > will work -- as a user I would much rather be informed of that, even as > just a caution, than to have Python not have the functionality even > after I had fixed the OS problems. > > Mind you, I have no idea how hard it would be to make this happen in the > module in an intelligent way. As I said, we can just emit a Warning instead of raising an exception. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
