On 10/01/2011 19:05, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:24, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net <mailto:solip...@pitrou.net>> wrote:On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 15:18:12 -0800 Brett Cannon <br...@python.org <mailto:br...@python.org>> wrote: > > OK, so the sentence is poorly phrased, but in the list of tasks it is > labeled explicitly as intermediate when one is comfortable with the > process, not a newbie. Does that alleviate the worry you both have? It does seem to alleviate it :) Sorry for not noticing! However, could the following be removed from the list: “Is there a proper unit test that can reproduce the bug?” We don't need or require unit tests to reproduce bugs; and besides, some things simply are very difficult to write an unit test for. A reporter need not be an experienced Python developer able (or willing) to write an elaborate unit test reproducing, for example, a timing issue involving Unix signals and the IO stack ;) Fair enough. I will remove it.
Well, *often* a test that exposes the issue can be written - and if so it is a useful exercise (surely).
Michael
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk
-- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ May you do good and not evil May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others May you share freely, never taking more than you give. -- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
