On Jan 20, 2011, at 9:31 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
>> Modified: peps/trunk/pep-3333.txt
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- peps/trunk/pep-3333.txt (original)
>> +++ peps/trunk/pep-3333.txt Fri Jan 7 16:39:27 2011
>> @@ -310,9 +310,9 @@
>> elif not headers_sent:
>> # Before the first output, send the stored headers
>> status, response_headers = headers_sent[:] = headers_set
>> - sys.stdout.write('Status: %s\r\n' % status)
>> + sys.stdout.buffer.write('Status: %s\r\n' % status)
>> for header in response_headers:
>> - sys.stdout.write('%s: %s\r\n' % header)
>> + sys.stdout.buffer.write('%s: %s\r\n' % header)
>
> Also note that .buffer might not be available in some cases (i.e. when
> sys.stdout has been replaced with other objects).
Do you have a recommendation for a better way to do bytes I/O on stdin/sydout,
then?...just saying that .buffer might not be available isn't a very useful
comment unless there's a replacement idiom...
James
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
