-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am 30.01.2011 17:35, schrieb Victor Stinner:
> Le dimanche 30 janvier 2011 à 22:52 +1000, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
>> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Georg Brandl <ge...@python.org> wrote:
>>>> And why it does test with and without "module".
>>>
>>> Because it always did (there's a thing called backwards compatibility.)
>>>
>>> This is of course probably the obvious one to start a deprecation process.
>>
>> But why do we check the long suffix for the *new* extension module
>> naming variants from PEP 3149 and PEP 384? Those are completely new,
>> so there's no backwards compatibility argument there.
>
> My implicit question was: can we limit the number of tested suffixes? I
> see two candidates: remove 'module.cpython-32m.so' ('.cpython-32m.so'
> should be enough) and 'module.abi3.so' ('.abi3.so' should be enough).
>
> And the real question is: should we change that before 3.2 final?
We most definitely shouldn't.
Georg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk1FltgACgkQN9GcIYhpnLDquwCfZH+jtM6nsXz4Iyi2XrhpDKBH
+6IAnA4Be/CWQhiQ9hq1VqGH2ent7say
=e1d5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
