On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:50:18 +0200
anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:45:45 +0000
> > techto...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> I see no reason for b.p.o bureaucracy. Mercurial-style workflow [1] is
> >> more beneficial to development as it doesn't require switching from
> >> console to browser for submitting changes.
> >
> > Ok, why don't you contribute to Mercurial instead?
> 
> If you don't want to receive a stupid answer, why don't you read the
> link and say what you don't like in this approach in a constructive
> manner?

Very simple: I don't want to be spammed with tons of patches, patch
reviews, and issue comments. Also, I want the history of issue
discussions to be easily accessible from permanent, issue-specific
URLs, rather than search through mailing-list archives to understand
why a change was made.

I appreciate that you refrained from giving a stupid answer, however.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to