2011/2/9 <[email protected]>: > On 12:43 pm, [email protected] wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Mark Shannon <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> OK, so UnicodeError_xxx is important for codecs, but surely this sort of >>> argument could be made for lots of things. >>> Don't forget that for each function added to the API, >>> all other implementations have to support it forever. >> >> Other implementations that want to support CPython extensions should >> focus their efforts on the limited API defined in PEP 384. That will >> not only be a lot easier, it will also be less of a moving target. > > And will produce what kind of results? How many extension libraries work > with this subset?
Probably none because it hasn't been released. That's the goal. -- Regards, Benjamin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
