On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 06:40, Jameson Quinn <[email protected]>wrote:
> "class attrdict" is a perennial dead-end for intermediate pythonistas who
> want to save 3 characters/5 keystrokes for item access. Other languages such
> as javascript allow "somedict.foo" to mean the same as "somedict['foo']", so
> why not python? Well, there are a number of reasons why not, beginning with
> all the magic method names in python.
>
> But saving keystrokes is still a reasonable goal.
>
Code is read far more often than it is written, so readability tends to
count more than most other metrics.
So what about a compromise? Allow "somedict..foo", with two dots, to take
> that place. It still saves 2 characters (often 4 keystrokes; and I find even
> ', "[", or "]" harder to type than ".").
>
I don't see the benefit, but maybe it'll save a few bytes in file size.
Anyone reviewing your code now has to think "does this need one or two
dots?"
Anyways, why not just do something like this:
class AttrDict(dict):
def __getattr__(self, attr):
return super(AttrDict, self).__getitem__(attr)
>>> d = AttrDict()
>>> d["a"] = 1
>>> d.a
1
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
