On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org> wrote: >> I want to test the dev community interest in modifying the stdlib to >> ease dependence injection. > > I, for one, am -1. Code shouldn't be uglified for the purposes of > testing.
Well, the philosophy of dependency injection requires exactly that. Personally I am on the fence; I've seen is used effectively but I've also seen code, indeed, uglified with little benefits. (Same for other extreme testing practices like TDD.) > It's also a slippery slope. Maybe we should add parameters > for open() and io functions? What about sys and os? Those often need > to be mocked. There are existing solutions that work pretty well, so I'm thinking there is no big problem that this solved. But my main concern is about anything that proposed to make sweeping changes to a large number of stdlib modules. This has almost always resulted in reduced quality. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
