Am 03.04.2011 23:28, schrieb Nadeem Vawda: > On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: >> On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 18:55:33 +0200 >> Éric Araujo <mer...@netwok.org> wrote: >>> I think we use Misc/ACKS for code+docs contribution like this one, >>> Doc/ACKS.txt being used for doc-only changes. This second file is not >>> comprehensive nor always used though, so maybe it should be superseded >>> by the former. >> >> Nadeem is already in Misc/ACKS. I don't know what the policy is for >> Doc/ACKS.txt, but since he added himself in the patch, I saw no good >> reason for reverting the change. > > I added myself because I assumed the policy for Doc/ACKS.txt to be the same > as the policy for Misc/ACKS - if you submit a patch, add your name. Looking > at the devguide, though, I can't find any mention of Doc/ACKS.txt. > >> +1 for merging these files by the way. > > Sounds good to me. The intro at the top of Misc/ACKS is pretty broad, > thanking people for all contributions (not just code). Unless there's some > plan to split the documentation off into a separate repository, I can't > think of any reason not to merge them.
If we can get Misc/ACKS in a format that is includable in reST, I would be +1 for a merger. (That way we can still list acknowledgements in the docs.) Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
