On 4/3/2011 10:02 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Sure, but do we have any indication that the warnings for dis make a difference?
I think there had been a few grumbles about bytecode not being stable.
Without that, it is part of the newish effort to specify in the docs
what is CPython specific. In http://bugs.python.org/issue11762
I propose a lighter version of the dis notice:
"CPython implementation detail: The ast definition is specific to the
CPython interpreter! Ast nodes may be added, removed, or changed between
versions. Use *ast.__version__* to work across versions."
and that ast.__version__ get a normal formal entry
ast.__version__
String constant with version number of the abstract grammar file.
3.1: '67616'; 3.2: '82163'; 3.3: 'xxxxxxxxx'
--
Terry Jan Reedy
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
