> Ok, so it sounds like ast is *not* limited to CPython? That makes it > harder to justify changing it just so as to ease the compilation > process in CPython (as opposed to add new language features).
I propose a different view: the AST *is* implementation specific, although implementations are certainly encouraged to use a similar AST if they provide an AST module at all. Applications of it then explicitly need to be ported to each version of each Python implementation that supports an AST module. If the ASTs are similar, this porting will hopefully be easy. The only alternative I can see is to freeze the AST structure, allowing for extensions at best. I don't think any of the implementations are in a state where such an approach is feasible. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
