On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Anthony Scopatz <scop...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > Thanks for putting this together. I am a huge supporter of benchmarking > efforts. My brief comment is below. > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:52 AM, DasIch <dasdas...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> 1. Definition of the benchmark suite. This will entail contacting >> developers of Python implementations (CPython, PyPy, IronPython and >> Jython), via discussion on the appropriate mailing lists. This might >> be achievable as part of this proposal. >> > > If you are reaching out to other projects at this stage, I think you should > also be in touch with the Cython people (even if its 'implementation' > sits on top of CPython). > As a scientist/engineer what I care about is how Cython benchmarks to > CPython. I believe that they have some ideas on benchmarking and have > also explored this space. Their inclusion would be helpful to me thinking > this GSoC successful at the end of the day (summer). > Thanks for your consideration. > Be Well > Anthony
Right now, we are talking about building "speed.python.org" to test the speed of python interpreters, over time, and alongside one another - cython *is not* an interpreter. Cython is out of scope for this. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
