Martin v. Löwis <martin <at> v.loewis.de> writes: > I can see three possible areas of improvment: > 1. Bugs: if there are any, they should clearly be fixed. However, JSON > is a simple format, so the implementation should be able to converge > to something fairly correct quickly. > 2. Performance: there is always room for performance improvements. > However, I strongly recommend to not bother unless a severe > bottleneck can be demonstrated. > 3. API changes: people apparently want JSON to be more flexible wrt. > Python types that are not directly supported in JSON. I'd rather take > a conservative approach here, involving a lot of people before adding > an API feature or even an incompatibility.
I agree with all these points, though I was only thinking of Nos. 1 and 2. Over a longer timeframe, improvements may also come with changes in the spec (unlikely in the short and medium term, but you never know in the long term). Regards, Vinay Sajip _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
