On 17 April 2011 06:32, R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> wrote: > I don't think the PEP is asking this either (or if it is I agree it > shouldn't be). The way to get full branch coverage (and yes Exarkun is > right, this is about individual branches; see coverage.py --branch)
One thing I'm definitely uncomfortable about is expressing the requirement in a way that depends on a non-stdlib module (coverage.py). Should coverage.py be added to the stdlib if we're going to take test coverage as a measure? Hmm, maybe it goes without saying, but does coverage.py work on Jython, IronPython, etc? (A quick google search actually indicates that there might be some issues still to be resolved...) Paul. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
