Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 à 11:57 -0500, Benjamin Peterson a écrit : > 2011/4/20 Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@haypocalc.com>: > > Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 à 20:24 +1000, Nick Coghlan a écrit : > >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Victor Stinner > >> <victor.stin...@haypocalc.com> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Le mardi 19 avril 2011 à 22:42 -0400, Terry Reedy a écrit : > >> >> On 4/19/2011 5:59 PM, victor.stinner wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Issue #11223: Add threading._info() function providing > >> >> > informations about the > >> >> > thread implementation. > >> >> > >> >> Since this is being documented, making it part of the public api, why > >> >> does it have a leading underscore? > >> > > >> > Well, I suppose that this function might be specific to CPython. Do you > >> > think that this function can/should be implemented in PyPy, Jython and > >> > IronPython? > >> > >> I agree with your reasoning (and the leading underscore), but I > >> suggest marking the docs with the implementation detail flag. > > > > I chose to return a dict to be flexible: any thread implementation may > > add new specific keys. There is just one mandatory key: 'name', name of > > the thread implementation (nt, os2, pthread or solaris for CPython 3.3). > > How about using a structseq ala sys.float_info or sys.long_info? (In > fact, we might want to put this in sys.)
Would you prefer something like the following example? >>> sys.thread_info sys.threadinfo(name='pthread', 'lock_implementation': 'semaphore', version: 'NPTL 2.11.2') >>> sys.thread_info sys.threadinfo(name='nt', 'lock_implementation': 'semaphore', version: '') >>> sys.thread_info sys.threadinfo(name='os2', 'lock_implementation': '', version: '') Victor _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
