On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > [1] Okay, that's a lie. I'm sure that persistent minority would *love* to > have NaN == NaN, because that would make their (ab)use of NaNs easier to > work with.
Too bad, because that won't change. :-) I agree that this is abuse of NaNs and shouldn't be encouraged. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
