On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Georg Brandl <g.bra...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 27.04.2011 23:23, Vinay Sajip wrote: >> I've been recently trying to improve the test coverage for the logging >> package, >> and have got to a not unreasonable point: >> >> logging/__init__.py 99% (96%) >> logging/config.py 89% (85%) >> logging/handlers.py 60% (54%) >> >> where the figures in parentheses include branch coverage measurements. > > BTW, didn't we agree not to put "pragma" comments into the stdlib code?
I think some folks objected, but since they're essential to keeping track of progress in code coverage improvement efforts, there wasn't a consensus to leave them out. The pragmas themselves are easy enough to grep for, so it isn't like they don't leave a record of which lines may not be getting tested. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
