On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:29:46 +0200 DasIch <dasdas...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Given those facts I think including pybench is a mistake. It does not > allow for a fair or meaningful comparison between implementations > which is one of the things the suite is supposed to be used for in the > future.
"Including" is quite vague. pybench is "included" in the suite of benchmarks at hg.python.org, but that doesn't mean it is given any particular importance: you can select whichever benchmarks you want to run when "perf.py" is executed (there are even several predefined benchmark groups, none of which pybench is a member IIRC). Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
