In article <[email protected]>,
 Tarek Ziadé <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Ned Deily <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Just to be clear: what about for the build of the interpreter itself,
> > i.e. its setup.py for the standard library extension modules?  Will the
> > existing distutils code continue to be used for that? [...]
> It will remain distutils-based for now. Moving it to packaging is not
> our top priority.

+1.  Thanks!

-- 
 Ned Deily,
 [email protected]

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to