On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 15:58, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: > On Wed, 25 May 2011 09:41:46 -0400 > Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote: >> I think it would be a nice feature, and I can see the conflict. OT1H you >> want >> to keep os.chown() a thin wrapper, but OTOH you'd rather not have to add a >> new, arguably more difficult to discover, function. Given those two choices, >> I still think I'd come down on adding a new function and shutil.chown() seems >> an appropriate place for it. > > +1 for shutil.chown().
and so shutil.chown() be it: http://bugs.python.org/issue12191 Currently, only the function for a single file is implemented, let's look later what to do for a recursive one. Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
