On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 10:33:14 +0200 "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote: > Am 06.06.2011 10:11, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: > > Le lundi 06 juin 2011 à 17:01 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull a écrit : > >> You might question whether the same document should serve both the > >> "cargo cult the examples" group and the "read the fine print" group. > >> That's a valid question, but here my feeling is that the answer is > >> "yes". > > > > So did you read the discussion before posting? The sockets HOWTO > > *doesn't* serve both groups. > > Actually, I would argue that it serves neither of them. > > How can you make such claims when several people have indicated that > the howto *actually* helped them?
The point here is that the examples in that document are very poor (the only substantial example actually duplicates existing functionality - in a sub-optimal manner - without even mentioning the existence of said functionality), and the technical explanations are nearly non-existent. So I'll happy stand by my claims. The Python documentation isn't meant to host any potentially helpful document, however flawed. We have the Internet for that. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com