On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Ben Finney <ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > Rob Cliffe <rob.cli...@btinternet.com> writes: > >> 'function attributes' ? 'def attributes' ? > > -1. They don't have to be functions, and hence don't have to be created > by 'def'. > >> Or just stick with method attributes' ? > > "callable attributes" describes exactly what they are, in terms that > will remain useful to the person learning Python. >
The usage of the object determines what we call it then, so what about "state attributes" in the same vein as "callable attributes" (data vs. method). But it would be nice to have the names consistent across the different contexts. ABCMeta tests __isabstractmethod__ on each attribute of a class, not just the methods, rather that __isabstractattribute__. Perhaps calling something a method attribute even when it isn't a function is still okay. Thus the pair could be "method and data attributes". "method attribute" is a little redundant but calling it a "function attribute" seems less consistent -eric > -- > \ "'Did you sleep well?' 'No, I made a couple of mistakes.'" | > `\ --Steven Wright | > _o__) | > Ben Finney > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ericsnowcurrently%40gmail.com > _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
