Hello, 2011/7/4 Aigars Mahinovs <aigar...@gmail.com>
> I have been doing some multithreaded work lately and have found that often what I find wanting to do is to call a function, have it check > it's arguments, possibly do some work and then return to the caller, > but still do some extra processing right after that. Currently to > accomplish such feat I need to separate the 'extra processing' bit > into a separate function and call that in a separate thread. A nice > convenience would be a function or statement that would allow to > return a value from the current function, but still keep running its > code (in a separate thread). Such approach could then be used in many > places where async processing is required, such as GUI programming, > XMLRPC, web applications, ... with less boilerplate and more obvious > code flow. > This kind of topic is not suitable to python-dev. Please ask this on the python-list mailing list, or eventually on python-ideas. (where someone will probably suggest you to use a nested function) Cheers, -- Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
