Le 14/07/2011 13:33, Georg Brandl a écrit :
Would it make sense to not propagate the signal in one case (e.g. SIGUSR1),
i.e. just display the traceback in this case?
I opened this issue for buildbots. If the test suite doesn't fail
anymore because of a SIGALRM or SIGUSR1, we may miss a bug in a test, or
a real bug in a module. I don't think that anyone will read the output
of all builds.
I patched faulthandler for this issue: I added a chain argument to
faulthandler.register() to call also the previous signal handler. I
prefer to call the original signal handler to not change the current
behaviour of the test suite.
Victor
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
