On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:21:43 +0200
Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behnel.de> wrote:
> Nick Coghlan, 15.08.2011 14:35:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Antoine Pitrou<solip...@pitrou.net>
> > wrote:
> >> AFAICT, often with True and False:
> >>
> >> x = (some condition) ? Py_True : Py_False;
> >> Py_INCREF(x);
> >> return x;
> >
> > And that's an idiom that works better with a Py_RETURN macro than it
> > would separate macros:
> >
> > Py_RETURN(cond ? Py_True : Py_False);
>
> And that would do what exactly? Duplicate the evaluation of the condition?
You don't need to.
#define Py_RETURN (x) do { \
PyObject *_tmp = (x); \
Py_INCREF(_tmp); \
return _tmp; \
} while(0)
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
