On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > I wonder if for > this particular purpose SWIG isn't the better match. (If SWIG weren't > universally hated, even by its original author. :-)
SWIG is nice when you control the C/C++ side of the API as well and can tweak it to be SWIG-friendly. I shudder at the idea of using it to wrap arbitrary C++ code, though. That said, the idea of using SWIG to emit Cython code rather than C/API code may be one well worth exploring. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
